In the Indian Sub-continent, the
penal law had been Varna-based for millennia, after the Aryans subjugated the
natives. People from higher Varna were given lesser punishment while the people
of lower Varna were given punishment of higher degrees during the Vedic era for over 900 years (1500 BC – 600
BC), until Lord Mahavir and Lord Buddha exposed the hallowness of Vedas and
created an egalitarian society. But, the terrorist Chanakya committed all the
heinous crimes to subvert that kind of society, and bring in Brahmanical Social
Order once again, to ensure special previleges to the Brahmins by birth. That
system continued upto the commencement of British era in 1700s. After the
British have left, the Brahmins have again brought in the age old, diabolical,
Vedic era, by occupying the power-centres like RAW, IB, MEA and MHA. Indians had, really, had proper penal law
only during the small spells of Buddhist era and British era. The discriminatory treatment would become
evident from the manner in which the assassins of Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi
and Rajiv Gandhi were treated by the Brahmin controlled Indian bureaucracy and
media.
A few details are given below:
1. Open trial vs. In camera trial:
Mahatma Gandhi assassination trial
was held in open. The assassin was Godse, a Brahmin. But, the trial regarding
the assassination of Indira Gandhi and the murder of Rajiv Gandhi were held in
camera, and the people who were tried for that assassination were non-Brahmins.
Public were not made to know what had really gone inside the Court-hall, during
these two trials.
2. Public discussion permitted in one case and denied in
the other two:
While one cannot totally find fault
with such in camera trials for the reason that even the trial on the
assassination of Kennedy was held in camera, one must know the Americans were
not fakes like the Indians whose thought-process is sought to be controlled by
the Aryan dominated RAW, IB, MEA, MHA and the media. In the USA, people were permitted
to discuss their views in the newspapers. Lyndon Johnson, the Vice-President
had succeeded Kennedy. But, nobody objected to a popular stage-show that was
conducted at that time, for a very long time, portraying Lyndon Johnson as the
conspirator who killed Kennedy to become President. The oligarchy of bureaucrats
in India decide that Indians should not be given such rights.
3. Discussion by public during the period of trial:
In India, the Aryans created an
atmosphere of glorification of Godse, during the period of trial of Godse. To
some extent, such discussion was allowed during the trial of the alleged
-repeat alleged - assassins of Indira Gandhi. But, during the period of the
trial of the alleged - repeat, alleged - assassins of Rajiv Gandhi, the Aryan
agencies created such a frenzy against the entire struggle of Tamils, that the
common people felt afraid even of hearing anything about the problems of Lankan
Tamils, except the propaganda of the Aryan Press against Tamil and Tamils.
Remember the way Ms. Jayalalitha threatened openly and imprisoned even the
'sympathisers' of LTTE and the Eelam cause, in 1991. That situation became
handy for the Sinhalese to continue with its genocide against Tamils, with more
intensity and venom. Cho and Ram were leading the pack in the Aryan media to
prevent the Tamils in Tamilnadu and the rest of Indians from seeing what had
actually happened in Sri Lanka.
4. Defence was not made available to the alleged
assassins of Rajiv Gandhi:
Godse was glorified as a hero by the
Aryan media during the period of his trial and funds were collected, through
advertisements in newspapers, from all corners of the nation to defend him. (If
any Aryan feels panicky on this exposure and comes to the Facebook with filthy
comments, he may refer, at least, to the Rajendra Prasad's letter to
Vallabhbhai Patel on 13.10.1948: (Page
150 & 151- Dr. Rajendra Prasad: Correspondence and Select Documents- Vol.
10) In this letter, Patel refers to the revival of of RSS activities,
drills and the formation of a shadow organisation Janadhikar Samithi. He also
says that in its meetings congressmen Tandon and Gadgil had participated. He
says that he ahd alsoe been asked to address a meeting but had declied.
However, Kripalani had addressed, he says.
He writes about the manner in which
Godse was defended, and a hero was made
out of him. He also records the fact that subscriptions were raised and
distinguished lawyers were invited from various places for the defence of the
people involved in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.
5. Assistance by Government during the period of
trial:
Godse was supplied with pen and paper
at Government’s cost to make his statement explaining how and why he wanted to
kill Gandhi. He wrote book ‘May it please your honour’, while he was in jail. The
statement made by Godse before the Court has been published as a book with the
title ‘May it please your honour’. What is more, a copy of the book had been
managed to be kept in the Gandhi Memorial too at Kanyakumari. It was removed
later, when someone raised the issue. But, the accused in Indira case and Rajiv
case were not allowed even to talk to the press.
6. Play to defend Godse permitted:
A play in Marathi by name “Mee
Nathuram Godse Bolsthoy” (Naan Nathuram Godse Paesuhiraen) is being staged
everywhere justifying the action of Godse. The Hindu editorially supported the
staging of play calling it a freedom of speech (Note 1). But, the same
Hindu was writing with poison-filled pen, on Lankan Tamil issues after 1987.
7. Memento:
The admirers of Godse have been
permitted to keep his ashes as a memento. And they perform rituals with it till
date, every year, and keep it in safe custody until the day the Akhand Bharath
as desired by Godse is born. At the same time the Aryan agencies did not allow
even the chappals or clothes of Satwant Singh who was alleged to have killed
Indira Gandhi to be handed over to his widow after he was hanged.“The Godse clan and
the 'Nathuram Godse Ichchapatra Nyas' commemorate November 15, the day of Narayanrao
Apte and Nathuram's 'martyrdom', as 'Ichchapatra Punar Vachat Diwas'
(repetition of the will day). As per his command, Nathuram's ashes are to be
immersed in the Sindhu river only when it flows under the Indian flag. Till
then, the foundation is to ensure it is passed on from one generation to the
next” (Ashes for Posterity – Saira Menezes- Outlook – 02.02.1998).
8. Difference in Defence between Indira case and Rajiv
case:
Even the alleged assassins of Indira
Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi were not treated on par. The alleged assassins of Rajiv
Gandhi have been and are being treated worse. First the Aryan newspapers
orchestrated such a campaign that many lawyers did not come forward to defend
the accused in the Rajiv case while that was not the case with the accused in
the Indira Gandhi case. They were defended by the prominent lawyer Ram
Jethmalani and others.
9. Media venom:
Media treated the cases of Mahatma,
Indira and Rajiv with totally different yardsticks. In fact, Rajiv Gandhi or his mother Indira Gandhi were not such great personalities as Mahatma Gandhi was.
Rajiv Gandhi had stolen public money
in the guise of acquiring arms for the defence of the nation. Dr. A.P. Mukherjee, former CBI Director in 1989-90 explains the
facts. A news item, with reference to his book “Unknown Facets of
Rajiv Gandhi, Jyoti Basu and Indrajit Gupta” is given below for the
information of the readers (Note 2). He committed various heinous crimes during the period
of his premiership. Yet, he was given an aura that he was more important a
personality than Mahatma Gandhi.
Indira Gandhi had syphoned off
commission money in Kudremukh project case and put that money in Swiss Banks,
utilizing the services of two RAW officers Mr. Kao and Mr. K. Sankaran Nair and
Mr Kaul, the Finance Secretary. (Note 3).
The newspapers did not spread venom
against the accused in the Indira case. On the other hand, when the accused
Satwant Singh was hanged on not-so-clearly-proven evidence, the Indian Express
came out with a cartoon by the famous cartoonist Ravishankar that the God of
Justice had been hanged. But, that is not the case with the accused in the
Rajiv case. But, Maalan, one of the blood-thirsty editors in Tamilnadu, had
said that he was happy with the judgment of the lower court which sentenced 21
persons to death and said that he would be happy to hear the sound of pulleys. Naturally,
he would have been unhappy when many of them were let off later by the higher
courts. The Manu mentality ingrained in his DNA was displayed, thus, by Maalan,
without any sense of remorse or regret. Such cruel editors controlled the media
and the thought-process of the Tamils in Tamilnadu.
The only difference one could see
from these incidents and events is that the Aryan media still views everything
that happens in India through the 'Varna' lens only. Mahatma was not a Brahmin
while Indira and Rajiv were. After all, Rajiv Gandhi was a Brahmin and was
recognized as such by the Brahmins Association in January 1996. Evidence on
record proves that there had been very severe punishment to the killers of the
Brahmins right from the days of Manu and very light punishment to the Brahmin
killers who kill non-Brahmins.
Mr. Arun Jaitley has gone on record
having said that Rajiv case could not have been brought to a close but for TADA
evidence, i.e.,evidence obtained by torture. prosecution had not been sincere
enough to know the truth. The government had frightened the people that anyone
who talked in favour of the Lankan Tamils, let alone the LTTE, would be booked.
It should have allowed a public debate to unearth the truth
Conclusion:
Unless the non-Brahmins insist on their right to be treated as equals,
India will continue to suffer from the tyranny of Vedic legacy. Even if the
crime is the same, punishments would be different for different Varnas.
Note 1: The Hindu editorial July 20,
1998.
Note 2: Rajiv Gandhi wanted the Bofors money used for Congress Party work.
Note 3: The book ‘Inside IB and RAW’ (Pages 171, 172 and 173) by Sankaran Nair contains evidence
regarding the deposit of money in Swiss Bank by Indira Gandhi in the account
kept by her in the name of Sanjay Gandhi.
true
ReplyDelete