Saturday, 8 November 2014

"பிராமணர்கள்" ஆதிக்கத்தைத் தடுத்த இராஜராஜ சோழன்!



தேவாரம் மீட்ட இராசராசன் 


All the kings of ancient India were under the control and blackmail of the Brahmins, who compelled them to protect Chaturvarna. Prince Adiththa Karikaalan was assassinated by a cunning group and that was the reason his younger brother Rajarajan had to yield to brahmins. There was no Periyar or Buddha at that time. It is not only the king who has to do everything in society. The thinkers in the society have a duty too. But, the system of Chaturvarna did not allow thinkers to emerge among non-Brahmins. 


Yet, we must appreciate Rajaraja who retrieved Thevaram from the clutches of the cunning brahmins of Chidambaram. His son Rajendra was also a great king in having protected the empire built by his father. 

Presentist analysis of these kings is not fair. They did not have any helping hands in those days.



"எல்லைகள்' என்ற வலைத்தளத்திலிருந்து:

உத்தம சோழனால்  ஆதரிக்கப்பட்ட  பிராமணர்களின்  ஆதிக்கத்தை  ராஜராஜ சோழன் ஆட்சிக்கு வந்தபோது,தடுக்கும்  செயல்களில் ஈடுபட்டு  வந்துள்ளான்!

         தனது அண்ணன்  ஆதித்ய கரிகாலனைக்  கொன்றவர்களை  கண்டுபிடிக்காமலும்,கண்டுபிடித்து  தண்டிக்காமலும்,கொலையாளிகளை நாட்டிற்கு  அறிவிக்காமலும்  இருந்த நிலையை உணர்ந்து, ஆட்சிக்குவந்த  இருஆண்டுகளில்  கண்டுபிடித்து, அவர்களது  சொத்துக்களைப் பறிமுதல்  செய்து, "திருவநேந்தேசுவரத்து" கோயிலுக்கு  ஒப்படைக்கும்  பணியைச் செய்தான்!

       இந்த பணியை ராஜராஜனின் ஆணைக்கு  இணங்கி, " கோட்டையூர் பிரம்ம ஸ்ரீ ராஜனும்,புள்ளமமங்கலத்து சந்திர சேகரனும் செய்தனர்"  என்று( Epigrapic india volume XXI. No.27) தெரிவிக்கிறது! 

        ராஜராஜனின்  மெயகீர்த்தியாக (புகழ்ந்துரைக்கும் ) பாடல் ராஜராஜனின் வெற்றிகளைப் பற்றி கூறுகிறது!
       அதில் இடம் பெற்று உள்ள"  காந்தளூர் சாலை கலமருத்தருளிய"   எனபது  பிராமணர்களின் பொறுப்பில் இயங்கிவந்த  இடம் எனவும், அங்கு பிராமணர்களுக்கு  ஆட்சி,அதிகாரம் குறித்த பயிற்சி( இன்றைய ஐஏஎஸ்,ஐபிஎஸ்  போல)அளிக்கப்பட  கல்விசாலை எனவும், தனது ஆட்சியில் பிராமணர்கள்  தன்னிச்சையாக  இதுபோன்ற பள்ளியை நடத்துவதை தடுக்கவும்,பிராமணர்களின் ஆதிக்கத்தை ஒடுக்கவும்தான்  காந்தளூர் சாலையின் மீது  படைஎடுத்தான்.  இந்த இடம் சேர நாட்டில் இருந்தது! என்றும்  அதனாலேயே,  ராஜராஜனின் மெய்கீர்த்தி  அதனைப் போர் என்று கூறாமல்  "காந்தளூர் சாலை களம் அறுத்து அருளிய" என்று  கூறப்பட்டு உள்ளது என்று தனது  சோழர்கள் சமயம் என்ற நூலில்  டாக்டர் .ஆ.பத்மாவதி  அவர்கள்  குறிபிடுகிறார்.!

        பிராமணர்களின்  ஆதிக்கத்தைத்  தடுக்க,  ராஜராஜன்  அவர்கள் அறியாதபடி பல்வேறு நடவடிக்கைகளை  எடுத்தான்.ஆதலால்  ராஜராஜனுக்கு  அவனது இறுதிகாலத்தில் அந்தணர்களின் ஆதரவு  குறைந்தது  என்று  தனது சோழர்கள் நூலில்  கே.எ.நீலகண்ட சாஸ்திரியும்  குறிபிடுகிறார்!
          ராஜராஜனது  ஆட்சியில்  மக்களின் நலனை முன்னிட்டும், அந்தணர்களின்  ஆதிக்கத்தைக் குறைக்கவும், நிர்வாகத்தை  எந்த சிக்கலும்  இன்றி  நடத்தவும்  செய்த  செயல்களில்  ஒன்றாகவே,குட ஓலைத் தேர்தலும்  உள்ளது!

         இந்த குடவோலைத்  தேர்தல் மூலம்  தனது  ஆட்சிப்பகுதியை  நேரடியாக  ராஜராஜனால்  நிர்வாகம்  செய்ய முடிந்தது!

For more: 
http://generationneeds.blogspot.in/2012/04/blog-post_17.html?showComment=1415498436949


நன்றி: எல்லைகள் வலைத்தளம். 

Who looted the people at Somanath?


“The most important of all the expeditions of Mahmud the Ghazni was the one against Somnath. Mahmud started from Ghazni in October 1024 A.D. …. When Mahmud arrived at Anhilwara in January 1025 A.D, its ruler, Raja Bhima Deo, ran away from the capital with all his followers. Those who remained were defeated and plundered. After that, Mahmud made his way to Somnath.”

“Ibn-al-Athir tells us that when the army of Mahmud reached Somnath, it found that the people of Somnath were amusing themselves on the walls of the fort at the expense of the Muslims telling them that their deity would cut off their heads and destroy them all. Next day when the Muslims advanced for assault, the Hindus left their posts on the walls. The Muslims planted their ladders against the walls and gained the summit. They proclaimed their success with the cries of Allah-u-Akbar. Then followed a fearful slaughter.
A body of Hindus hurried to Somnath, cast themselves before the deity and besought him to grant them victory. Night came and the fight was suspended. Next morning, the Muhammadens renewed the battle and made greater havoc among the Hindus, till they drove them from the town to the house of their idol Somnath. A dreadful slaughter followed at the gate of the temple. Band after band of defenders entered the temple and with their hands clasped round their necks, wept and passionately entreated Somnath. Then again they issued forth to fight until they were slain, and but few were left alive. These took to the sea in boats to make their escape but the Muslims overtook them and some were killed and some were drowned.”

“Al Qazwini (1203-83) describes the temple of Somnath in these words: “Among the wonders of that place, was the temple in which was placed the idol called Somnath. This idol was in the middle of the temple without anything to support it from below, or to suspend it from above. It was held in the highest honour among the Hindus, and whoever beheld it floating in the air was struck with amazement, whether he as a Mussalman or an infidel. …. Everything of the most precious was brought there as offering, and the temple was endowed with more than 10000 villages. …A thousand Brahmans were employed in worshipping the idol and attending on the visitors, and 500 damsels sang and danced at the door- all these were maintained upon the endowments of the temple. …Near (the idol) was chain of gold weighing 200 maunds. When a portion of the night closed, this chain used to be shaken like bells to rouse a fresh lot of Brahmins to perform worships”

The abovementioned three paragraphs have been excerpted from the book ‘History of Medieval India’ written by V.D.Mahajan and published by M/s S.Chand & Co which is meant to be a text book for the history students doing B.A and M A. in various universities. The book carries only part of the historical events. What the author has chosen to omit recording is given below.  But, the readers with common sense would wonder how a society - in which a temple has become so rich and famous, providing employment opportunity to “more than 1000” Brahmins and 500 damsels who sang and danced - could not provide even minimum resistance to the invaders and why the ruler, Raja Bhima Deo, who must also naturally have had adequate wealth and military force, chose to run away from the capital. The readers may go through the following facts now:

The Sanctum Sanctorum was built with the help of magnets on all the four sidewalls and also on the floor and the ceiling. The idol was made of iron sheets. Even the kings were not informed of this fact and nobody was allowed to go near the deity except the Brahmins. The only non-Brahmin who had access to it after the consecration of the temple was Mahmud the Ghazni. The surprised kings were informed that that the Shivling had not been erected there by ordinary men but the Lord himself had emerged there on his own and that was the reason for the miracle. The gullible kings and the public poured money in. There were set up numerous feeding centers for the Brahmins and Vedic schools near the temple. The Brahmins made hay thus for 600 long years. All the six kings of the Gurjara nation were called as Sishyas of the chief priest of the temple.When  Mahmud of Ghazni invaded Somnath there were jewels worth Rs.18 crores and jewellery worth Rs.20 crores.

The strengh of the army of Mahmud of Ghazni was only 25000. But, the Gurjara kings had an army of 41/2 lakh persons and were prepared to put up a stiff fight against the invader. But they had to act in accordance with the directives of their guru , the chief priest of the temple.But the guru told them that God had appeared before him and told him that He would protect the kings. The priest also said that God had vanished after imposing the condition that special homas must be performed and the Brahmins must be given Annadhan, Swarnadhan and Kanyadan. The priest therefore advised the kings not to go for war but to use the money intended for the war to be gifted to the Brahmins. He also told them that they face such problems as their belief in Puranas does not continue to be as strong as ever and advised them to be strictly faithful at least thereafter. Believing the words of their guru, the valiant kings waived the idea of counter attack and diverted the money for the welfare of the Brahmins.

1008 yagasalas were opened. Numerous Brahmins were employed for performing homa and Varna japas. Besides, astrologers were pressed into service to carry optimistic messages to the kings. In the meanwhile,  the invader had arrived within eight miles of Somnath. Mahmud of Ghazni became actually afraid how and why nobody had come to oppose him. He suspected whether it could be a ploy to trap him. He therefore sent his spies to collect information on the field situation. By now, the Brahmins had assessed the situation and decided to run away.  More than 11000 persons had thus run away and only 800 persons remained . The Muslim spies could not comprehend what was going on and reported that “many persons were pouring ghee and other eatables in fire alongwith sandalwood and wheat.  Even many precious materials are burnt that way. Besides, many human heads were floating in the water without however moving from one place to another. The entire town is covered by smoke. I did not see anything else”. The emboldened invader started advancing towards Somnath. On coming to know of it, the chief priest ordered for decorating his own pearl-studded palanquin and sent it alongwith the Devadaasis to receive the invader. When Mahmud of Ghazni reached the temple, he was received with fanfare and a throne was kept decorated for him in the inner sanctorum of the temple opposite to the diety. That throne was valued at Rs.50 lakhs at that time. Its name was Vyaspeet. The deity of the temple had also been decoraed with precious ornaments.

The chief priest went near the invader and said, “O! King of Kings!! We remain protected only by your honest rule.Mahavishnu; Pruthiveepathi! You are an avatar of the Lord Vishnu. The bogus kings here had said so many meaningless things about you. It was my arrow like words that controlled them. You should not, therefore, do any harm to the Brahmins. I shall place at your feet a sum of  Rs.3 crores as Dakshina”. But, the invader became furious and said, “Oh Kafir! Do you think I am a beggar? I have come here to punish those who worship stone”. Whereupon, the chief priest fell on the feet of the invader and prayed for his mercy pleading that all these arrangements were for their survival. But Mahmud did not heed. He said that these priests were cheating the innocents and were also cheating God. He demanded the treasury be shown to him.  When only some portions of the treasury were shown to him, the invader tied the finger of the chief priest with cloth and soaked it in oil and burnt it in fire. Immediately, the chief priest had shown the entire treasury. The invader looted them all. He had ordered for demolition of the temple. The idol had fallen on the ground on the destruction of magnetic walls. The invader immediately broke that idol also. Gushed out of it like a stream were pearls, diamonds and various precious stones. The invader said that because he had broken the idol, God had given him the award. He had taken them all. He also took along with him 6000 women and 5000 men. Out of these 11000 persons, Brahmins constituted only 800 persons. All the others were Shudras. More details about it are available in Arabic and Gujarathi books.

  1. The kings were given wrong advice.
  2. The armed forces were made ineffective.
  3. The country was betrayed and the interests of the Brahmins alone were sought to be protected. &
  4. The men and women became prisoners of the invaders and subjected to eternal humiliation.

All this only because the kings of those days had been captives of the Brahmins and accepted them as their gurus and acted according to their advice. The Brahmins who had been cheating the people and looting their money all along with the protection of the king, had been exempted from payment of tax to the government. “There was no principle of equality of law among the Hindus; the Brahmans were exempted from capital punishment… The share of the state was 1/6th of the produce and Brahmans were completely exempted.”(Page 56- History of Medieval India – V.D. Mahajan – S.Chand &Co) The common Shudras stomached the insult and held the Brahmins in high esteem. The kings had venerated them. Still, the Brahmins had all along been loyal only to themselves and were prepared to betray them at the earliest available opportunity.


Thursday, 6 November 2014

The Art of text-book writing!


Law students in India have to study the history of evolution of criminal law both during the ancient era and the later era.

Ancient criminal law must include the laws of Manu and Kautilya. These laws were intended to protect the Chatruvarna system and were totally unjust. Manu’s law was intended to perpetuate apartheid in society to enable the Brahmins lead a cushy life at the cost of the others.  Whatever exists in the world is, the property of the Brahmana; on account of the excellence of his origin. The Brahmana is, indeed, entitled to all”, says Manu. The Brahmins justified their tendency to covet all, through this declaration. Manu says more:

379. Tonsure (of the head) is ordained for a Brahmana (instead of) capital punishment; but (men of) other castes shall suffer capital punishment.


380. Let him never slay a Brahmana, though he have committed all (possible) crimes; let him banish such an (offender), leaving all his property (to him) and (his body) unhurt.
381. No greater crime is known on earth than slaying a Brahmana; a king, therefore, must not even conceive in his mind the thought of killing a Brahmana.”
But, the law students in India are not taught the actual picture of criminal law in the ancient India. The book, “Laws of Manu - Translated by G. Buhler” is not part of their syllabus in Penology.

The abovementioned historical facts are blacked out by the Brahmin authors who write various books and the Brahmin authorities of the universities prescribe those perverted books as text books for law students. One such example is the book “Criminology and Penology” authored by N.V. Paranjape. Following is the text reproduced from Pages 158 & 159 of the said book (1998 edition):

“The efficacy of punishment, by and large, depends on impartiality. The penal policy should, therefore, be completely free from considerations as to the caste, creed, religion or status of the offender. It would be pertinent to note in this context, that the failure of criminal justice during Moghul rule in India was solely due to the discriminatory nature of Muslim law or crimes and evidence. Thus, no Mohammedan could be awarded capital punishment on the evidence of an infidel, that is, the unbeliever in the Muslim faith. Further, the evidence ofone Mohammedan was equivalent to two Hindus and evidentiary value of two female witnesses was equal to one male witness under the Muslim law. A thief could be convicted only on the evidence of two men. This amply evinces irrationality of the muslim criminal law and the bias which it carried against Hindus and women”.

But, the same author in the previous page, No. 155, writes as under:

“A well defined penal system did exist in ancient India even in the time of Manu or Kautilya”


Dear Readers, this book has been prescribed as text-book for law students in graduate and post-graduate levels in various universities. What is more? The Brahmin-dominated Ministry of Home Affairs does also recommend this book for the students of “M.A. in Criminology” in the LNJN National Institute of  Criminogy and Forensic Science”.

Monday, 3 November 2014

Indira Gandhi Vs. The suppressed races of humanity!

This write-up is in reply to the statement of Mr. Perinbam Vaz in the Facebook wherein he says: 

“விடுதலைபுலிகளுக்கு உதவியவர்,கத்தி கொண்டு களத்துக்கு போவது யார் என்று தான் பார்க்க வேண்டும்,நோஞ்சான் கத்தி கொண்டு போனால் கத்தியையும் உயிரையும் இழப்பான்,அதே சமயம் கெட்டிகாரன் வெறும் கையுடன் சென்றாலும் வெற்றியுடன் திரும்புவான் இந்திரா காந்தி கச்ச தீவை தாரைவார்த்தாலும் இலங்கையை சரியான முறையில் கையாளும் திறன் அவருக்கு இருந்தது., கச்ச தீவை கொடுத்தது பெரிய தவறென்றால்,அதன் பின் வந்த்தவர்கள் அதை கையாண்ட விதம் மிக மிக தவறு.”

The reply: 

In regard to the so-called assistance by Indira to the Tigers, the fact is thatsuch make believe arrangements are meant only for this kind of propaganda. Indira Gandhi was not for Eelam, inspite of the fact that there was more justification for Eelam when comparedwith the justification for Bangladesh. This problem was after thenever-before-never-after-enmasse denial of citizenship rights to plantationTamils, for which she too played an active role to help her friendBandaranaike. It was Indira Gandhi who refused to meet Jaffna GandhiChelvanayakam in 1973 when she had gone to Colombo and enlarged the scope ofhumiliating the Plantation Tamils.

 If only she had met Chelva, in 1973, the subsequent need for militancy to find a solution to the Eelam problem in 1983, would, probably, not have arisen at all.

===


This was in the backdrop of the peaceful agitation launched by the Eelam Tamils with effect from 2nd  October 1972. 





Dinamani had editorially acknowledged this fact in its editorial dated 20.10.2012.



It is a fact that her father Jawaharlal Nehru had also refused to meet Jaffna Gandhi Chelva in 1958, although the Tamils there had been massacred in the first large-scale riot against Tamils by the Sinhalese led by Jayawardane. 

Kannadasan has immortalised the evil propensity of Jawaharlal Nehru in this regard:



Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi had behaved thus in an imperious and callous manner because of the conspiratorial tendency of the bureaucrats of the Ministry of External Affairs, who played mischief against Tamils, in various matters, including Kachativu.

If only these two had not obeyed the command of the bureaucrats of the Ministry of External Affairs and evaluated the issues as per their conscience, lakhs of Tamils would not have been killed in Eelam and near Kachativu. Russian Prime Minister confirms the role of the officials in controlling the thoughts and actions of the people's representatives. "It's the court which makes the king" (The Hindu 15.09.2008).


Assam massacre and Indira Gandhi

Indira Gandhi had been personally responsible for the massacre of Assamese in 1983 also. She didnot, therefore, have any special sympathy for the rights of the people anywhere. 
===

Bangladesh and Indira Gandhi

But,because, the Bengalis are, by nature, fighters for their rights (unlike theslavish attitude of Indian Tamils) and because she wanted to take 'thousandyears revenge' so seriously, she intervened for the liberation of Bangladesh. 

How shestarted the assistance to create Bangladesh can be seen from the followingexcerpt from the biography of Siddharth Shankar Ray: 

SiddharthShankar Ray, writes: 

In 1971, before the Bangladesh war, Indira Gandhi told methat she felt the Bangladesh Mukti Bahini (liberation army) would get a hugemorale boost if a Bengali-speaking minister from Delhi gave them a pep talk.She told me no one will ever know about this if you succeed and no one willblame you if you fail. This meant that the mission was not official. Of course,I understood. The status of the freedom movement under international law wasn’tclear then, and of course, India didn’t want to go around giving ‘moraleboosts’ to separatist movements in other countries. I never asked her to tellme whether she took this decision on her own or whether she consulted anyoneelse. I did go to East Pakistan, which included a tense stay at the home of afriend who was clearly worried about my safety but knew better than to ask.Then, there was a two-hour jeep ride deep into an East Bengal jungle where athousand boys greeted me by singing Amar Sonar Bangla. I was moved to tears.(Outlook 29.11.2010). 


Absolute Power and  Absolute Corruption

She was the first prime minister of India to deposit ill-gotten money in Swiss banks,by utilising the services of the IAS Officers in the RAW and the FinanceMinistry.



===




There is nothing to glorify her. There is a lot of blood in her hands. More than 500Tamil fishermen have been shot dead by the Sinhalese only because of her 1976 agreement, which was more unlawful, than the 1974 agreement. She was, really,an enemy of the humanity. She cared only for her welfare and the welfare of her family members. 

Shah Commission

The contents of Shah Commission Report would reveal more about the manner in which she went around subverting democracy. It was a commission which functioned in a transparent and democratic manner, unlike the Sarkaria Commission, set up by her, which did not permit even cross examination of witnesses, during the period emergency and under the cover of censorship. The findings were true. That was why, she ensured that the Shah Commission Report was not kept anywhere in the nation, and destroyed all of them, after she came to power in 1980.


If all the Tamils know these facts, there would be no need for any agitation. The north-Indian politicians in power would realise that they have to abandon their anti-Tamils attitude, in spite of the advice to the contrary by the officials of the Ministry of External Affairs,  and treat the Tamils also as a part of humanity.