Wednesday, 20 August 2014

Worship of Lord Siva: Exclusively Dravidian!


The Dravidian system of worship was  idolatry, i.e., puja (Poo –sai – Neri) to a concrete religious symbol that enables an average man to love, perceive and comprehend his God. The Dravidians used to worship God with water, leaves and flowers. The Aryan system of worship was ‘yagna’, the imageless worship. The Aryans lit fire and threw animals into it to propitiate their God. They believed that the fire was the messenger who carried their message to their God. This is the fundamental difference between the religions of the Aryans and the Dravidians.




The Himalayas with its splendid, dazzling, magnificent and awe-inspiring aura, overwhelmed the hearts of the Dravidians of the pre-historic age to a great extent that they revered it as the abode of their God and visualized the river Ganges that originated from it as His wife. During their day-to-day prayers and festivals, they used to prepare the image of the abode of their God for their worship. That image depicted the plain land, the mountain over it and the river that flowed from the mountain over the plain. As everyone was permitted (in sharp contrast to the way the Brahmins had  later appropriated to themselves the right of access to the deity) to prepare such an image for one’s own worship, and given the fact that all the people were not sculptors, the image, in due course, took the present form in  which it is installed and worshipped in the Siva temples. Such transformation in shape had taken place in the Indus Civilization period itself. The base representing the plains was not always circular but was also a square, as could be seen from the famous cave No.16 of the Ellora. Building tall towers with rectangular base for the entrance of the temples were also meant to signify the Himalayas which was the abode of the Lord and the plains. The Kudamuzhukku, the Thirukkudaneerattu vizha was and is essentially and exclusively Dravidian in origin representing the river Ganges that originated from  the  Himalayas and flowed over and through it towards the plains.

Saivite and Hindu temples must remain under Government control only!


The Emperor Raja Raja Chola the Great constructed the Big Temple at Thanjavur utilizing the revenue of his government. He did not hand them over to any independent body of Saivites or Hindus to manage it.  The temples remained under the management of the government and proved to be an important source of revenue to their governments.  The same was the case with all the kings. When the country passed from one conqueror to another the control of the temples also changed hands. Even the Muslim rulers kept them under their control.

In a Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam case, the then Madras High Court had observed as follows: “Up to 1843, when the defendant’s predecessor was appointed trustee of the temple, all surplus revenues of the temples, after defraying the cost of the temple service, were approrpriated by the sovereign power. This practice, the British government inherited from its Muhammadan and Hindu predecesssors, and it has prevailed from time immemorial. The surplus thus appropriated (by the government) amounted, at the beginning of the last (18th)century, to something like two lakhs of rupees annually”(Page 41- Right of temple entry- P Chidambaram Pillai).

Needed: Conscription in India!


===============================================

For the emancipation of OBCs, SCs and STs.

==============================================

Switzerland is not at war with any nation. But, military service is compulsory there for every Swiss citizen. People who want to study beyond the age of 20 are directed to complete the conscription period and continue their studies thereafter. When a nation is under attack by enemies, it becomes the duty of every citizen to protect the nation. A Rifle For Every Manhas been the declared principle of the Government of Switzerland. The Swiss Government proudly proclaims to the world that “every soldier …..has his weapon, ammunition and uniform at home. There is no fear of revolutions. The Swiss are proud to have a accurate rifle.” (Switzerland – by Herbert Meier – Information paper published by the Swiss Government – Sixth Edition 4/81).

Germany had conscription for male citizens between 1956 and 2011. Conscription  in  Germany has been kept  in abeyance from 1 July 2011. The constitution, however, retains provisions for reintroduction of conscription.

 Conscription is in force in Israel for Jews.  Even the ultra-orthodox jews are conscripted. But, the Arabs living in Israel are not permitted to conscript.  Military service is compulsory for most Israelis over the age of 18, with men serving three years and women two. The Israeli concept is that “all sectors of society should participate in national service”.

But, the concept of Universal Conscription in the modern sense originated only during the French Revolution, when the Republic needed stronger military forces. Conscription was made a condition of citizenship. The 1798 Jourdan Act stated: "Any Frenchman is a soldier and owes himself to the defence of the nation". This concept resembled the ancient Tamils call for the defence of the nation. Conscription continued in various forms for two hundred years until it was phased out during the period 1996 − 2001.

In Spain, “the end of conscription has spelt recruitment problems for the armed forces.”  The Defence Ministry has acknowledged that there are 10,000 vacancies.

Conscription, part of ancient Tamil Culture

The ancient Tamils did not leave the defence of the nation at  times of war only to the regular armed forces. The literary work Puranaanooru testifies to the fact that every household was sending one man to join the army. The nation could mobilise the might of its citizens at short notice by issuing a proclamation that every household should send one male member to protect the nation (வீட்டுக்கொரு ஆண்மகன் நாட்டைக் காக்கப் புறப்படுக). Those men who did not go for war did nor command respect and were looked down upon by the society.

Saturday, 2 August 2014

Tamil Vs. Sanskrit Part II


Sanskrit: A Talibanic Offshoot!


“Destroy the language, if you want to destroy a race”, said Socrates.  Sanskrit was intended to do exactly that.
          Sanskrit was created with the intention of regaining and retaining the lost identity of Aryans during the sub-Buddhist era. If it has remained just like that we would have no grievance against it. But, the promoters of the language had, during the earlier NDA period, introduced it as an optional subject in the Central Schools.  Sanskrit news broadcast is encouraged and for that purpose the tax paid by the people of all languages are used. To cap it all, the propagandists are going to the extent of performing a “Talibanism” to suppress historical facts by claiming that this later-day-language is the mother of all other Indian languages. It is there where they have chosen to rub shoulders on the wrong side. It is, therefore, felt necessary that the Talibanic mentality of the promoters of Sanskrit must be exposed.

Tamil Vs. Sanskrit Part I


Political and Economic Imperialism of the Brahmins
through Cultural imperialism via Sanskrit!


An open letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, New Delhi.

Sir,

1.   Although the United Nations has realised the importance of all the languages and recognised the inalienable right of every man to love and protect his mother language, and declared that February 21st as the International Mother Language Day, the Brahmin bureaucrats who occupy disproportionately and unjustly, high share of the Group A and B posts in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of External Affairs, RAW and IB want to run the nation in a way that would be convenient only for Brahmin domination, do not come forward to celebrate the International Mother Language Day. Because, they are afraid that such a celebration of Indian languages would not help Brahmin domination. They believe that resurrection of Sanskrit would alone give them upper hand in social and political arena, as was in the past.
2.   The purpose of the International Mother Language Day, as declared by the United Nations, is:


"We hope that the spirit of the International Mother Language Day will help develop in us a deep respect for not only one's own mother tongue, but for those of others as well; help the expression of all kinds of majority and minority languages and put an end to the dictates of one language over the other."


3.   But, the non-Hindi people of India are denied this privilege of celebrating their mother-tongues. The people who see their Sanskrit in Hindi do not want the common people of the nation to celebrate their individual mother languages. This, in spite of the fact that The Government of India has been under an obligation to take measures for the development of these languages, such that "they grow rapidly in richness and become effective means of communicating modern knowledge."-(Official Languages Resolution, 1968, para. 2). As per Para 2 of the Official Language Resolution, 1968, it is “necessary in the interest of the educational and cultural advancement of the country that concerted measures should be taken for the full development” of all the major languages specified in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.