Mr. William F. Tate IV, the President of the University, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey, USA, deserves heartfelt appreciation of the honest and right-thinking people all over the world, for allowing the Center for Security, Race and Rights (CSRR) to hold, in the University, the seminar titled "Hindutva in America: A Threat to Equality and Religious Pluralism.”. It is a timely event in the context of the Brahmin fundamentalists' of Hindu religion in India capturing various political and social organisations both In India and in the USA, to perpetuate their Brahmin Supremacist Theory, which enabled them in the past and which enables them now also to indulge in various peace-time genocidal activities against the Non-Brahmins in the same ‘Hindu’ religion by enforcing the most cruel form of Apartheid which the rest of the world has not experienced.
Opposition by Apartheidists:
2) As
expected, the oppressors have swung into action and are carrying on a
vilification campaign against the proposed conference of the CSRR. The letter
written by four members of the US Congress Democrats Suhas
Subramanyam, Shri Thanedar, Sanford Bishop and Republican Dr. Rich
McCornick to the President of the University, Rudgers at the behest of
the HAF
and CoHNA is part of that vilification campaign. This
letter suppresses the cunning programme schedules of the Brahmin
Fundamentalists, whose intention is to perpetuate the policy of apartheid
practised by the Brahmins in this sub-continent for millennia, without making
the world to know of their scheme and design. Apartheid practised by
the Whites in South Africa in the past was just skin-deep, while the apartheid
practised by the Brahmins in India, even at present, is soul-deep and much more
wicked.
Africa has evolved while India has not:
3) Africans
have turned a new leaf. The Constitutional
Court of South Africa while describing and defining the notion of
equality held, “This substantive notion of equality recognises that besides
uneven race, class and gender attributes of our society, there are other
levels and forms of social differentiation and systematic under-privilege,
which still persist. Constitution enjoins us to dismantle
them and to prevent the creation of new patterns of disadvantage”. (Para
17 - Minister of Finance v Van Heerden 2004 6 SA 121 (CC) 27). But the
Indian Brahmins never mature and never grow up. They openly declare that they
are born superior. Sankaracharya of Kanchi says, “How can one find fault
with the system that has given separate and elevated status to the Brahmins
that they alone are fit to study Vedas? How come, everyone can study Vedas? Are
all equals?” (Sankaracharya of Kanchipuram- Deivaththin Kural -
Vol. 3 - Page 876).
Hitlerian concept on blood and Language:
4. This migrant community of Brahmins still enforces
that venomous policy of apartheid and unleashes vicious hate-campaigns in the
field so that it could maintain its blood-purity and language-purity.
i. It opposes inter-caste marriages to maintain whatever
‘purity’ is left of its blood;
ii. It also projects an artificially created language, the
Sanskrit, as a superior and divine language to be used by the Brahmin priests
in temples to offer worship of God.
5. It is worth comparing the attitude of this
migrant community with the doctrine of purity invented, later, by Hitler, who
lamented that “The Aryan gave up the purity of his blood and, therefore, lost
his sojourn in the paradise which he had made for himself.” (Page 87–
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich – William Shirer). “It (History)
shows, with a startling clarity, that whenever Aryans have mingled their blood
with that of an inferior race the result has been the downfall of the people
who were the standard-bearers of a higher culture.” (Page 240 – Mein
Kamph – Adolf Hitler – Hurst and Blackett Ltd. Publishers – London –
Edition 1939). In keeping with the ideology of Hitler, in Tamil Nadu,
the Brahmin’s Association (Thambraas) asks the Brahmin children to take oath
that they would not opt for inter-caste marriages, although within the same
religion. Their circular reverberates only the Hitlerian assertions. N.
Narayanan. President, Thambraas, said, "Brahmanism is not only a caste;
it's a way of life. Our boys and girls, who are more than 15 years old, have
been taking oath every year during the Pongal (harvest) festival to remain true
to the brahmanical way of life and oppose inter-caste marriages.”- Times
of India – 25.05.2012. This would show that Hinduism is not really a
religion for all those kept within that fold by law, but an instrument of the
Brahmins to keep the Non-Brahmins at bay by subjugating them forever.
Don’t ask for more, the Brahmanical fiat:
6. Even during the era of freedom struggle,
Brahmins refused to treat the Non-Brahmins on par in religious matters. On
25.12.1935, while speaking at the Punjab & Frontier Hindu’s Conference at
Campbellpur, which was also described as “the Sanatanist Conference”, Mahant
Ramdas of Pandauri, President of the Conference, “vehemently opposed
marriages outside the castes and inter-dining”. He deprecated the efforts
of the reformers who worked for the right of entry of all people into temples.
He “reiterated that the Depressed Classes should be satisfied with
the domes of the temple, as according to the Sastras, they were entitled
only to this extent” (Page 310 – The Indian Annual Register – July to
December 1935 – Vol. II.- Editor Nripendra Nath Mitra). He had
forgotten the fact that those ‘Sastras’ which he was alluding to, were those
which were written only by his Brahmin ancestors, with mala fide motives, and
that he could not claim any divinity for those Sastras. He just expected the
suppressed people of the same Hindu religion to just accept whatever was given
to them by the Brahmins and not to ask for more. The way that Mahant
Ramdas was expressing his anguish in that conference, with unrelenting venom
and toxic fervour, testified to the extent of hatred, which the Brahmin
fundamentalists had long been harbouring towards the Non-Brahmins.
Churchill foresaw what was in store for Non-Brahmins:
7. Who can claim that there is fraternity in
Hinduism, when the Brahmin fundamentalists had been fighting for independence
from the British rule, while at the same time, retaining the master and slave
relationship between Brahmins and Non-Brahmins. No wonder, Churchill said
that “These Brahmins who mouth and patter the principles of Western Liberalism,
and pose as philosophic and democratic politicians, are the same Brahmins who
deny the primary rights of existence to nearly sixty millions of their own
fellow countrymen whom they call “untouchable”, and whom they have by thousands
of years of oppression actually taught to accept this sad position” (From
the text of a speech made by Churchill to the Indian Empire Society at the
Albert Hall in London on 18 March 1931 entitled ‘Our duty in India’- Page 120,
125 & 126).
8. The real problem is that even nine decades
later, these toxic Brahmin fundamentalists have not changed. The HAF and the
CoHNA are full of such fundamentalists. They do not feel the pain of the
suppressed classes within Hinduism and behave like the crow that obsessively
keeps on pecking at the festering wound on the bull’s hide, aggravating the
pain with every passing day. They do not come forward to make the posts of
priests universal for all castes within Hinduism, at all levels in the temples
in which Brahmins alone officiate as priests. One recalls only the manner in
which Hitler had pressed into service his propaganda machinery around the world
to prevent the world from knowing the genocidal activities carried on by him in
Germany. The cries of the HAF and CoHNA against the noble activities of the
CSRR are comparable only to the propaganda of malice carried on by Joseph
Goebbels.
9. They want to perpetuate their Brahmin
Supremacist Theory through their "Hindutva" agenda which does have
all the Hitlerian characteristics. It is that “Hindutva” concept which is
intended to be exposed during the ensuing event planned by the CSRR. The latest
letter written by four members of the US Congress — Democrats Suhas
Subramanyam, Shri Thanedar, Sanford Bishop and Republican Dr. Rich McCornick –
does not bring out truth but suppresses the cunning agenda of the Brahmin
Fundamentalists, whose intention is to perpetuate the policy of apartheid
practised by the Brahmins in India. Apartheid in South Africa was just
skin-deep, while the apartheid practised by them in India is soul-deep.
10. Article 1 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights proclaim that “All human beings are born
free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and
conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”. But
the Brahmin fundamentalists in India and abroad do not care for the "dignity" of the Non-Brhmins and venerate all the literaturary works that call the Non-Brahmins as low-borns (Kul-heenas). They continue to perpetuate apartheid by occupying the core power-centres and by cheating the rest in the name of religion. Brahmin religious heads
meddled with politics throughout the history of the history of the
sub-continent, with mala fide intentions.
The Questions, Rudgers may ask:
11. The President of the University of Rudgers would
be doing a splendid service to the humanity, if he calls for answers from the
HAF and the CoHNA to the following ten questions: Their answers will convince
him that these groups, which oppose the seminar of the CRSS are really racist
groups which do not nurture any honest and transparent attitude towards the
rest of the mankind. The questions to be posed to these groups are:
i. Is
it not a fact that even the modern-day Hindu religion, as per the law
governing that religion in India, balkanises and categorises the Hindus
into four categories called Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vysyas and Sudras?
ii. Is
it not a fact that the priesthood in money-spinning major temples in India is reserved
only for Brahmins and the Non-Brahmins are not allowed to officiate as priests
in those temples, on the ground invented by the Brahmins that the Non-Brahmins
as priests would pollute the God?
iii. Is
it not a fact that as per the etymology of the very word “Brahmin” (whose
origin is traced to the Rig Veda composed around 1500 BC, by the Brahmins who
migrated to the sub-continent from the Central Asia) implies that the
Non-Brahmins (Kshatriyas, Vysyas and Sudras) are low-borns (Kul-heena)?
iv. Is
it not a fact that post-2019, the Governments in India issues certificates to
the Brahmins stating that they are Brahmins by birth (a phenomenon that was
introduced after the present sectarian political party, the BJP, came to power
in 2019?
v. Is
it not a fact that when a person declares himself as a “Brahmin”, he wants to
derive benefit of that term claiming 3500-years-old-lineage of that term, and
implies explicitly that he, still, holds on to his “Brahmin supremacist
theory” and demonstrates that the rest of the people in the Hindu-fold are of
lower status to him by birth?
vi. Is
it not a fact that it is these Brahmin apartheidists who lobbied with the four
members of the US Congress to make them write the impugned letter to the
University of Rudgers, exhorting you not to allow the seminar of the CSSR to be
held there?
vii. Is
it not a fact that when Christianity does show such a tolerance that it has made it essential to hear even the “advocatus
diaboli” before canonisation of a noble person as a Saint, these Hindu
apartheidists in the USA do not have any such tolerance but are mortally afraid of their Chaturvarna-system-based
racial atrocities being made known to the outside world?
viii. Is it not true that, when Martin Luther, who protested against various practices of the Church, was never branded as one who was anti-Christianity, the Brahmin Fundamentalists brand those Hindus who challenge the Brahmin Supremacist Theory and Practices, as anti-Hindus?
ix. Is it not true that the Brahmin leaders like the Sankaracharyas never condemned the ignominious, sacrilegious, blasphemous and atheistic passage in the Aryan literature Mahabarath, which (i) shows the Brahmins to be superior even to the Gods (ii) declares that even if the original God appears, it would be treated by others as God, only if the Brahmins give recognition to that God as God and (iii) proclaims that the Brahmins could make anything into God, even if it is not God and (iv) claims that that the Brahmins could make the real God as no-God, if they want?
x. Is it not a fact that Sankaracharya of Kanchipuram declared, after Mahatma Gandhi met him in 1927 on the way to Vaikom, that the caste system was withering away and that that should not be allowed to go that way and that the caste system should be resurrected once again at any cost ("மறுபடியும் இந்தச் சாதி ஏற்பாட்டை உண்டாக்கத்தான் வேணும்" ?
Will the Indian versions of the KKKs, operating in the USA, the HAF and CoHNA, answer?
No comments:
Post a Comment