Mr. Manivannan has responded as given below, with closed mind, to the Rejoinder given as Part III of this series:
"These are lame excuses based on ideas
that were current during fascist, Stalinist era. All I'm asking is why can't
the middle castes demonstrate their egalitarianism by breaking the barriers
between them and the oppressed. That doesn't take much, does it? Fighting for a
principle is a lot easier and consistent. Attacking selected groups based on
their birth is primitive and discriminatory."
===
Such attitude of these spokesmen necessitates a reply. That is why
the following reply is given. It is for the readers to judge.
Brahmins
sabotaged the unity among the non-Brahmins
One never expects any
reasonable answer from the Ku Klux Klan or its advocates. When Mr.Manivannan
started asking pointed questions, I was happy that there were persons among the
Ku Klux Klan who would discuss the issues, open-mindedly. But Mr.Manivannan has,
through his replies and silence, demonstrated that the Brahmins would never
concede equal rights to the non-Brahmins and would never come out of their
mentality of apartheid. What he implies is that Brahmins would continue to be like
that and, it is for the subjugated classes to unite among themselves and then,
also, to remain under the Brahmins as slaves. Will tbe Brahmins keep quiet when
such grand alliance is formed? History, including contemporary history, tells
us that they would not allow any such grand alliance to come true. They would,
therefore, do their ‘duty’ to create dissension among them.
Knowledge (of the opponents' character) is power
The first thing that
the subjugated classes must do, in the context, is, therefore, to understand
the techniques of their common enemy who would never allow any rapprochement
between various sections of the subjugated classes. That was being done through the post in Part III of this series. And that, again, is what is
being attempted at through this post too.
===
Enabling the people
of all castes among the non-Brahmins in the Hindu fold to officiate as priests
in the HR&CE temples is the first
step for unity among the non-Brahmins. But, what did the Brahmins do, when such a step was taken? A
historical event is re-called here to show how the Brahmins had worked against the unity of all the subjugated classes in the Hindu fold and against the emancipation of Scheduled Castes.
Apartheid
soul-deep
The statement filed by the Hindu Fundamentalists, in the
Supreme Court challenging the amendment to the Tamilnadu HR&CE Act of 1970
made as per the recommendation of the Committee on Untouchability, Economic and
Educational Development of the Scheduled Castes, contained the following
argument in support of the policy of apartheid perpetuated by them for
millennia:
1. If the person who goes near the deity
is a Brahmin who is not a priest Samprotchanam must be done with pure water.
2. If he is a Kshatriya the
Samprotchanam must be with 7 pots of water.
3. If he is a Vysya, (a) Samprotchananm
must be performed with 24 pots of water and (b) Santhi homam must also be
performed.
4. If he is a Shudhra, (a)
Samprotchanam must be performed with 108 pots of water, (b) Mahasanthi homam
must be performed besides (c) offering food to Brahmins.
How dare they? But, they did. Mr. Manivannan must know that it was the Brahmins who worked
against the emancipation of Scheduled Caste people, thus, and not the intermediate
castes. Because, the step taken by the government was in the right direction, benefitting the society as a whole with the aim of evolving casteless society, in the short run.
In the year 1969 the Committee on Untouchability,
Economic and Educational Development of the Scheduled Castes had suggested in
its report that the hereditary priesthood in the Hindu Society should be
abolished, that the system could be replaced by an ecclesiastical organisation
of men possessing the requisite educational qualifications who might be trained
in recognised institutions in priesthood and that the line should be open to
all candidates irrespective of caste, creed or race. The Government of
Tamilnadu had, accordingly, amended Sections 55 and 56 of the Principal Act,
the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable, Endowments Act, 1959 to
facilitate Non-Brahmins also to acquire the qualification and officiate as
priests. The matter went to Supreme Court of India (Seshammal & Others Vs.
State of Tamilnadu – 14-03-1972). But,
those who perpetuated apartheid had the day, for peculiar reasons. If only
the British had learnt the tricks of these Hindu Fundamentalists and enforced
apartheid in South Africa in the name of religion, Nelson Mandela would not
have won. In South Africa, apartheid was skin-deep. In Hindu religion,
apartheid is soul-deep.
===
Now that Mr. Manivannan, the spokesman of the Ku Klux Klan of
India, has confessed to and exhibited the brahmanical animosity towards all the non-Brahmins,
which is true otherwise too, there are some options available to the suppressed
classes to redeem themselves:
“சொல்லிய பாட்டின் பொருளுணர்ந்து சொல்லுவார்
செல்வர் சிவபுரத்தின் உள்ளார் சிவனடிக்கீழ்ப்
பல்லோரும் ஏத்தப் பணிந்து." - மாணிக்கவாசகர்.
No comments:
Post a Comment